1 The retractions came only weeks after BioMed Central.
But it would be a mistake to look at this as a Chinese or Asian problem. The problem is the perverse incentive systems in scientific publishing. Provided that authors are rewarded for publishing many content articles and editors are rewarded for publishing them quickly, new ways of gaming the original publication versions will be invented quicker than new control methods can be put in place.. Charlotte J. Haug, M.D., Ph.D.1 The retractions came only weeks after BioMed Central, an open-access publisher owned by Springer, retracted 43 articles for the same reason. How can you really fake peer review? Moon, who studies medicinal vegetation, had set up a straightforward method. He gave journals tips for peer reviewers for his manuscripts, providing them with e-mail and brands addresses.Since 1974, standard farmers have been dousing their crops with what these were told is a totally safe, broad-spectrum weedkiller. This weedkiller has since end up being the number one offering herbicide in the globe, but an evergrowing body of independent science now shows that it is destroying human health, promoting obesity, infertility, tumor, irritable bowel syndrome, dementia and autism. While making farming ‘less difficult supposedly,’ Roundup is becoming ubiquitous throughout the environment and in the modern food supply. Home owners and gardeners alone use over 100 million pounds of it each and every year just to keep their lawns free of weeds and their golf courses perfectly manicured. But the result is normally that glyphosate is now present in nearly every person’s body.